KULLI @ RAJESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/6362/2025 · 2025-07-21
Sangeeta Chandra, Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151767 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151767 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41578-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6362 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kulli @ Rajesh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records.
2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main prayer:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report was lodged on 08.07.2025 by opposite party No. 4 against Petitioner in Case Crime No. 0087/2025, U/S 137 (2), 131, 352, 351 (3) BNS & Sections 3 (1) (द), 3(1) (घ), P.S-Haraiya, District- Balrampur (Annexure No. 1). (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite parties to Not to Arrest the petitioner and not to take any coercive action against the petitioner on the basis of impugned First Information Report in Case Crime No. 0087/2025, U/S 137 (2), 131, 352, 351 (3) BNS & Sections 3 (1) (द), 3(1) (घ), P.S- Haraiya, District- Balrampur."
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been arrested, as such, he does not want to press the petition.
4. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. . [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] [Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra, J.] Order Date :- 21.7.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench