ARPIT SRIVASTAVA v. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM II LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
A227/4186/2025 · 2025-07-18
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151736 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151736 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41141 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4186 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arpit Srivastava Respondent :- District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum Ii Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging an ex parte
order dated 17.03.2023.
3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the lawyer did not file the reply that was given to the lawyer, which has resulted in passing of the ex parte award.
4. Considering the fact that the case of the petitioner is that the procedural review process was not followed, the present petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file an order recall application seeking recall of the order dated 17.03.2023, subject to the petitioner depositing an amount of Rs.4 lacs within a period of 15 days from today and the petitioner filing an application for recall, the District Consumer Forum shall reconsider the order and pass a fresh order within a further period of four months after hearing the parties. In case, if the amount is not deposited as directed above, the benefit of this
order shall not available in favour of the petitioner.
Order Date :- 18.7.2025 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench