KALLU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY., REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/6753/2025 · 2025-07-17
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151724 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151724 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40793-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6753 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kallu Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy., Revenue Deptt., Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard. The petitioner alleges destruction of the boundary mark by the Lekhpal and the Gram Pradhan after the same had been put in terms of an order passed allegedly under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. However, the learned Standing Counsel says in the garb of the said demarcation, the petitioner had encroached land which is earmarked as khad Gaddha land. These are not matters to be considered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner may approach the S.D.M., Hasanganj, District Unnao by way of an application which can be considered and a decision be taken thereon at the earliest say within six weeks. Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. [Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajan Roy,J] Order Date :- 17.7.2025 Nitesh Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench