Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15172 (RAJ)

POOJA KUMARI D/O SHRI DEVI SINGH, W/O OM SHANKAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/2993/2021 · 2025-09-03

Ashutosh Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35242] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2993/2021 1. Pooja Kumari D/o Shri Devi Singh, W/o Om Shankar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Prajapati Mohalla, Rarahe, Bharatpur, At Present R/o Deeg Road, Janakpuri Colony, Gundwa, Bharatpur. 2. Om Shankar S/o Shri Parshuram Saini, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Deeg Road, Janakpuri Colony, Gundwa, Bharatpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Superintendent Of Police, Bharatpur. 3. SHO, Police Station Sewar District Bharatpur. 4. SHO, Police Station Udhyog Nagar, Bharatpur. 5. Devi Singh S/o Govinda, 6. Urmila W/o Devi Singh, 7. Ishwar Dayal S/o Govinda, 8. Surendra Kumar S/o Ishwar Dayal, 9. Bhupendra Kumar S/o Ishwar Dayal, All R/o Prajapati Mohalla, Rarah, Tehsil Kumher District Bharatpur At Present R/o Near Kripal Ashram, Behind Baba Sugriv School, Rundhiya Nagar, Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. with Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 03/09/2025 1. Today, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners. [2025:RJ-JP:35242] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2993/2021] 2. The miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners for getting protection from private respondent Nos. 5 to 9. 3. The present petition is pending for almost last 4 years. 4. From the perusal of the record, it is admitted fact that the petitioners have solemnized their marriage and are living their married life peacefully since 2021. However, their married life is not agreeable to respondent Nos. 5 to 9. 5. In view of the aforesaid, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /57