Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:1621
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 26 of 2025
1. Gulshan Kumar Saluja S/o Late Shri Narayan Singh Saluja Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Mannu Chowk, Tikrapara, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
2. Jagdish Kumar Saluja S/o Late Shri Narayan Singh Saluja Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Mannu Chowk, Tikrapara, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
3. Guljari Lal Saluja S/o Late Shri Narayan Singh Saluja Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Mannu Chowk, Tikrapara, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner(s) versus
1. Satish Kumar Saluja S/o Late Shri Narayan Singh Saluja Aged About 62 Years Resident Of Mannu Chowk, Tikrapara, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (Plaintiff)
2. Nagar Palika Nigam, Bilaspur Through The Commissioner, Nagar Palika Nigam, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (Defendants)
3. Vijay Tuteja W/o Shri Kishan Lal Tuteja Aged About 70 Years Resident Of Pratap Colony, Indore (M.P.) Pin- 451010
4. Santosh Kohli W/o Shri Yograj Kohli Aged About 65 Years Resident Of Narsingh Nagar, House No. 2017 Near Radha Swami Satsang, Ranjhi, Jabalpur, Tahsil And District- Jabalpur (M.P.)
5. Neelam Gambhir W/o Shri Vijay Gambhir Aged About 63 Years Resident Of Swami Collection, 52 New Dewas Road, Indore (M.P.) Pin-451010
6. Kiran Dani W/o Chandrar Dani Aged About 60 Years R/o Mukta Jeans Wear, Jawahar Market, Power House, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh Pin- 490006
7. Sangeeta Arora W/o Shri Arun Arora (Advocate) Aged About 58 Years Resident Of 602 Ghanshyam Keshav, Khajrana Chouraha, Power House Ring Road, Indore (M.P.) Pin-451018
2
--- Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner
: Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Aniruddha Shrivastava, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 10 .01.2025
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to move a fresh application before the learned Court below at the peril of the petitioner.
2. No objection from the other side.
3. Permission granted.
4. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge $iddhant