Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 151691 (ALL)

RAMKISHUN JAISWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TRANSPORT DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/7673/2025 · 2025-07-16

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40491 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7673 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramkishun Jaiswal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Narayan Shukla,Diwakar Pratap Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 1 and Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 to 4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that by means of the order dated 23.07.2024, a copy of which is annexure 5 to the writ petition though the petitioner has been granted the benefit of the 2nd & 3rd ACP yet the said benefit have not been granted to them w.e.f the date the persons similarly circumstanced were granted the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 1 and Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 to 4 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. It is provided that in case any dues are found admissible to the petitioner the same shall be paid to him. Order Date :- 16.7.2025/Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench