Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15169 (AP)

Adusumalli Brahmaiah v. Adusumalli Rangaiah

SA/785/2004 · 2025-04-22

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010192072004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 785/2004 Between: 1. ADUSUMALLI BRAHMAIAH, S/O. KOTAIAH CULTIVATION R/O. MARLAPADU. ...APPELLANT AND 1. ADUSUMALLI RANGAIAH, S/O. KOTAIAH CULTIVATION R/O. MARLAPADU VILLAGE. 2. SINGAMANENI BRAHMAIAH, S/O. SUBAIAH CULTIVATION R/O. MARLAPADU VILLAGE. 3. PROFORMA PARTY TOBACCO BOARD, ONGOLE. THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE BRANCH MANAGER (PROFORMA PARTY) TOBACCO BOARD, ONGOLE. 4. ADUSUMALLI RANGAMMA, PRESENTLY W/O. BEJAWADA SRINU R/O. YARAJARLA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant: 1. VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T SURYA KARAN REDDY The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.785 OF 2004 J U D G M E N T: Sri Venkateswarlu Sanisetty, learned counsel for the appellant sought some more time to submit arguments. 2. The appeal is coming from 03.03.2025 under the caption “for Dismissal”. Later, two more adjournments were made at the request of the counsel for the appellant, to prosecute the appeal. Yet, the appellant is not coming forward to prosecute the appeal. 3. In that view of the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI 22.04.2025 Pmk 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.785 OF 2004 Date:22.04.2025 Pmk