Mr.Appireddigari Chenna Reddy v. Mr.More Venkatappa
SA/848/2004 · 2025-01-07
T Mallikarjuna Rao
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15163 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15163 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010193112004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 848/2004 Between: Mr.appireddigari Chenna Reddy ...APPELLANT AND Mr More Venkatappa ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:
1. T S ANIRUDH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent:
1. MD SALEEM The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellant/defendant under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the
Judgment and decree, dated 26.06.2003 passed in A.S.No.48 of 2000 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Punganur, Chittoor, reversing the
judgment and decree, dated 31.08.2000 passed in O.S.No.213 of 1999 on the file of learned Principal Civil Judge’s Court, Punganur.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of the appellant. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M.
3. In the afternoon session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellant is not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal.
4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Date:07.01.2025 MS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO.848 OF 2004 Date:07.01.2025
MS