KAMAL PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF SECONDARY EDUCATION LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/7711/2025 · 2025-07-17
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151621 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151621 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40778 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7711 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kamal Prakash Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Secondary Education Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Mishra,Arpit Dwivedi,Piyush Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1.Vakalatnama filed by Sri Prafulla Tiwari, learned counsel, on behalf of respondent no.5 is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri P.K. Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no.1 and 2, and Sri Tarun Mishra holding brief of Sri Prafulla Tiwari, learned counsel, on behalf of respondent no.5.
3. No notice be issued to respondents no.3 and 4 taking into
consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
4. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press prayer (i) and prays that as the Committee of Management has sent a proposal dated 18.06.2025 to the District Inspector of Schools, Hardoi, for promotion of respondent no.5 to the post of Lecturer in Economics but the claim of the petitioner has not been considered although he is eligible as such he has preferred his objections. It is prayed that respondent no.2 may consider the objections as preferred by the petitioner at the time
consideration of the proposal as sent by the Manager and decide the same in accordance with law.
4. To the aforesaid prayer learned counsels appearing for respondents have no objection.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to consider the objections as sent by the petitioner vide objections dated 20.06.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-12 to the petition, at the time of considering the proposal as sent by the Management dated 18.06.2025.
Order Date :- 17.7.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench