Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010142482025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2293/2025 M/S ARYA ERECTORS INDIA PVT LTD A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT HOUSE NO. 123, ARYA SMART LIVING, ABHOYPUR, NORTH GUWAHATI, P.O.-COLLEGE NAGAR, P.S.-CHANGSARI, KAMRUP, 781030, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR VERSUS PADUM DEORI S/O BRITISH DEORI, RESIDENT OF NIZARAPAR, PO JAGIROAD, DIST MORIGAON, ASSAM 782410 2:SMTI ARUNDHATI BARUAH W/O SHRI PADUM DEORI RESIDENT OF NIZARAPUR P.O - JAGIROAD DIST - MORIGAON 78241 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N DEKA, MR. M GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : MR S DAS, BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 12.08 .2025 Heard Mr. D.K. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. N. Deka, Page No.# 2/2 learned counsel for the applicant and also heard Mr. D. Mozumdar, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Das, learned counsel for the opposite party. Mr. Mozumdar, learned Senior counsel for the opposite party submits that he has no objection in the event of allowing this application under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, but the same has to be considered at the time of hearing of the appeal in terms of a decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin & Anr., reported in (2012) 8 SCC 148. Mr. Mozumdar also submits that the documents the applicant is willing to produce by filing this application are not relevant for the purpose of the appeal. Accordingly, taking note of the submission of learned counsel for both the parties, this interlocutory application stands allowed. The additional documents produced by this application will be considered at the time of final hearing of the appeal. Comparing Assistant Sd/- Robin Phukan JUDGE