Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15161 (JHR)

ANISH KERKETTA ALIAS ANISH EKKA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5271/2025 · 2025-07-02

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:17625 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5271 of 2025 ------ Anish Kerketta @ Anish Ekka aged about 19 years, son of Sunil Kerketta, Resident of Village -Samsera, Majha Toli, P.O. Samsera, P.S. Bolba, District, Simdega, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gaurav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.PP ------ Order No.02 Dated-02-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bolba P.S. Case No.02 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed the murder of Atul Ekka. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused- Rohit Ekka and his self-confessional statement. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.01.2025 as is evident from para-20 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-20 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Simdega, in connection with Bolba P.S. Case No.02 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/