NAJIDA HASSAN AND ANR. v. UNION TERRITORY THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND ORS. (HOME)
WP(C)/2799/2024 · 2025-12-19
Sanjeev Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15159 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15159 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 33 Suppl. cause list
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 2799/2024 NAJIDA HASSAN AND ANR
…Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Mukhtar Ahmad Makroo, Advocate Vs.
UNION TERRITORY THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
…Respondent (s) Through: Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG with Ms. Maha Majeed, Assisting Counsel
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER 19.12.2025
1. This is a petition by the petitioners, who claim to have contracted marriage out of their free will and volition, for seeking protection of their life and liberty.
2. This matter was considered by this Court for the first time on 2nd December, 2024, when this Court directed the learned counsel to produce the petitioners before the Court. Learned counsel Mr. Mukhtar Ahmad Makroo fairly submits that they have abandoned him and have not come forward to appear in the Court.
3. In view of the non-compliance of the order dated 2nd December, 2024 passed by this Court, and also the conduct exhibited by the petitioners, no interference of this Court is called for.
4. This petition is devoid of any merit and is accordingly dismissed.
(SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 19.12.2025
“Shahid Manzoor”