Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15157 (AP)

Smt.Thunga Bhagyamma v. Mr.Noothanakalava Munirathnam

SA/810/2004 · 2025-04-25

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010192232004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 810/2004 Between: 1. SMT.THUNGA BHAGYAMMA, W/O.SREENIVASULU TEACHER, APP HIGH SCHOOL R/O.CHOWDEPALLE (V) & (M), CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. MR.T.RAJESH, S/O.SREENIVASULU R/O.CHOWDEPALLE (V) & (M), CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. MR.T.VINOD BABU, S/O.SREENIVASULU R/O.CHOWDEPALLE (V) & (M), CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. T.SREEDEVI, D/O.SREENIVASULU R/O.CHOWDEPALLE (V) & (M), CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. MR NOOTHANAKALAVA MUNIRATHNAM REDDY, S/O.N,.CHENGA REDDY R/O.THELLANALLAPALLE, H/O.GADDAMVARIPALLE, CHOWDEPALLE (M). 2. SMT THUNGA PUSHPA KANTHAMMA, W/O.THUNGA PATTABHI CULTIVATION R/O.THELLANALLAPALLE, H/O.GADDAMVARIPALLE, CHOWDEPALLE (M), 3. MR THUNGA VENKATESH BABU, S/O.THUNGA PATTABHI CULTIVATION R/O.THELLANALLAPALLE, H/O.GADDAMVARIPALLE, CHOWDEPALLE (M). 4. MR THUNGA AMARANATH, S/O.THUNGA PATTABHI CULTIVATION R/O.THELLANALLAPALLE, H/O.GADDAMVARIPALLE, CHOWDEPALLE (M). 5. THUNGA ANURADHA, D/O.THUNGA PATTABHI CULTIVATION R/O.THELLANALLAPALLE, H/O.GADDAMVARIPALLE, CHOWDEPALLE (M). 6. THUNGA JAMUNA, D/O.THUNGA PATTABHI CULTIVATION R/O.THELLANALLAPALLE, H/O.GADDAMVARIPALLE, CHOWDEPALLE (M). ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. K G KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N PRAMOD The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.810 OF 2004 J U D G M E N T: Sri Ch.Venkatesh, learned counsel representing Sri K.G.Krishna Murthy, learned counsel for the appellants as well as Sri N.Pramod, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the matter was settled out of the Court, and therefore, the appeal may be dismissed, as settled out of the Court. 2. The same is placed on record. 3. In that view of the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed, as settled out of the Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI 25.04.2025 Pmk 7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.810 OF 2004 Date:25.04.2025 Pmk