Smt.Thunga Bhagyamma v. Mr.Noothanakalava Munirathnam
SA/810/2004 · 2025-04-25
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15157 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15157 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010192232004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL NO: 810/2004
Between:
1. SMT.THUNGA BHAGYAMMA, W/O.SREENIVASULU TEACHER, APP HIGH SCHOOL R/O.CHOWDEPALLE (V) & (M), CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
2. MR.T.RAJESH, S/O.SREENIVASULU R/O.CHOWDEPALLE (V) & (M), CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
3. MR.T.VINOD BABU, S/O.SREENIVASULU R/O.CHOWDEPALLE (V) & (M), CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
4. T.SREEDEVI, D/O.SREENIVASULU R/O.CHOWDEPALLE (V) & (M), CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
1. MR NOOTHANAKALAVA MUNIRATHNAM REDDY, S/O.N,.CHENGA REDDY R/O.THELLANALLAPALLE, H/O.GADDAMVARIPALLE, CHOWDEPALLE (M).
2. SMT THUNGA PUSHPA KANTHAMMA, W/O.THUNGA PATTABHI CULTIVATION R/O.THELLANALLAPALLE, H/O.GADDAMVARIPALLE, CHOWDEPALLE (M),
3. MR THUNGA VENKATESH BABU, S/O.THUNGA PATTABHI CULTIVATION R/O.THELLANALLAPALLE, H/O.GADDAMVARIPALLE, CHOWDEPALLE (M).
4. MR THUNGA AMARANATH, S/O.THUNGA PATTABHI CULTIVATION R/O.THELLANALLAPALLE, H/O.GADDAMVARIPALLE, CHOWDEPALLE (M).
5. THUNGA ANURADHA, D/O.THUNGA PATTABHI CULTIVATION R/O.THELLANALLAPALLE, H/O.GADDAMVARIPALLE, CHOWDEPALLE (M).
6. THUNGA JAMUNA, D/O.THUNGA PATTABHI CULTIVATION R/O.THELLANALLAPALLE, H/O.GADDAMVARIPALLE, CHOWDEPALLE (M).
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. K G KRISHNA MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. N PRAMOD
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.810 OF 2004 J U D G M E N T:
Sri Ch.Venkatesh, learned counsel representing Sri K.G.Krishna Murthy, learned counsel for the appellants as well as Sri N.Pramod, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the matter was settled out of the Court, and therefore, the appeal may be dismissed, as settled out of the Court.
2. The same is placed on record.
3. In that view of the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed, as settled out of the Court. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
25.04.2025 Pmk
7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL No.810 OF 2004
Date:25.04.2025 Pmk