SMT. NIRMALA DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/6695/2025 · 2025-07-24
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151552 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151552 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42545-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6695 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Nirmala Devi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Yadava,Deepa Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Manjeet Singh, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no. 6 is taken on record. There is a private dispute between the petitioners and opposite party no. 6. An order has been passed by this Court on 23.01.2025 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Copy of which has been enclosed as Annexure no. 2 to this writ petition. As regards the police authorities, they cannot unnecessarily and illegally interfere in any civil dispute especially if it is pending before the Court concerned unless there is an order of the Court to be complied. We are not concerned with private dispute between the petitioners and private opposite parties. We are only concerned with interference by the police. In this regard, we observe/direct that the police shall come into picture only if there is an apprehension of breach of peace or apprehension of commission of any crime or it is actually committed or there are other valid grounds in any law/statue for their interference such as an order of the Court to be implemented, but, without interfering in the civil dispute between the parties. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. [Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajan Roy,J] Order Date :- 24.7.2025 Nitesh Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench