RAM PADARATH VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
A227/4189/2025 · 2025-07-16
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40553 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4189 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Padarath Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Bhanu Singh,Ajay Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondent nos. 3 and 4, is hereby dispensed with.
3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of Case No. RST/4017/2022 (Computerized No. T202204230404017) U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Smt. Rafikul Nisha Vs. Kamlesh).
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2- Tehsildr, Tehsil- Milkipur, District Ayodhya considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2-Tehsildr, Tehsil- Milkipur, District Ayodhya, is directed to decide Mutation Case No. RST/4017/2022 (Computerized No. T202204230404017) U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Smt. Rafikul Nisha Vs. Kamlesh), expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional
circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench