- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4296 CRP No. 69 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 69 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. PADMA BAI W/O LATE RAMACHANDRA RAO, D/O LATE KRISHNOJI RAO, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT M.G. ROAD, NEAR SRI RAMA TALKIES, RAMANAGARA TOWN – 562159. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHANKUMARA D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. DURGENDRA RAO S/O LATE KRISHNOJI RAO, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR'S SMT. M. NIRMALA BAI W/O LATE DURGENDRA RAO AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 2. D. AKHILA BAI DO LATE DURGENDRA RAO AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 3. DARSHAN RAO, D S/O LATE DURGENDRA RAO AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS ALL ARE R/A MARUTI NAGARA, NEAR GHOUSIA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4296 CRP No. 69 of 2025 RAMANAGARA TOWN – 562159 4. NARASINGA RAO S/O LATE KRISHNOJI RAO, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR'S SMT. UMA BAI W/O LATE NARASINGA RAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 5. SMT. BHAVANI BAI D/O LATE NARASINGA RAO AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 6. SRI. YOGESH RAO. N S/O LATE NARASINGA RAO AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS ALL ARE R/A VINAYAKANAGARA, WARD NO.7, RAMANAGARA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 562161 7. SMT. NARASU BAI W/O KRISHNA SINGH, D/O LATE KRISHNOJI RAO, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.456, KALASIPALYA, RAMANAGARA TOWN 562120 …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 17.12.2024 PASSED IN FDP NO.5/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RAMANAGARA, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 54 R/W SEC.20 RULE 18 OF CPC AND IN ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4296 CRP No. 69 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 30.01.2025, seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition, since a Regular Second Appeal was required to be filed and not a Civil Revision Petition. Liberty is also sought that the petitioner may be permitted to file Regular Second Appeal. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file Regular Second Appeal. If such an appeal is filed, the time spent before this Court in the present petition shall be taken into consideration for the purpose of computation of limitation. 4. Office to return the original/certified copies, if any, after taking the photocopies for the file. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL