Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 151508 (ALL)

Deepak Singh @ Guddu Singh v. State of U.P. THRU SEC. HOME DEPARTMENT

A482/5690/2025 · 2025-07-15

Subhash Vidyarthi

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40185 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5690 of 2025 Applicant :- Deepak Singh @ Guddu Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru Sec. Home Department Counsel for Applicant :- Devendra Pratap,Shashank Shekhar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard SriShashank Shekhar Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Ashok Srivastava, learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the file, including the Annexures attached therewith. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in four cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that it is impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases, details of which are as follows: "i. Case Crime No.2257 of 2013, under Sections 302, 201 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Unnao, ii. Case Crime No.2260 of 2013, under Section 4/25 of Arms Act, Police Station Kotwali, District Unnao, iii. Case Crime No.0220 of 2023, under Section 120-B I.P.C. and 3(2)5 of SC/ST Act, Police Station Bighapur, District Unnao and iv. Case Crime No.0082 of 2024, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster Act, Police Station Bighapur, District Unnao." 4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case which shall be treated to be valid in other three cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Preeti. Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench