Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:14464
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A No. 4466 of 2025 Sachin Das, aged about 27 years, son of Subal Das, resident of Village Lakhnuwa, PO-Saptar, PS-Madhupur, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand
… Petitioner(s)
Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s)
:Mr. A. K. Choudhary, Advocate For the State
:Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, APP
--------
Order No.02 /Dated: 3rd June 2025
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) PS Case No. 50 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the Information Technology Act.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no incriminating articles have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 25.03.2025 as such, he may be enlarged on bail.
4.
Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.
5.
Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties
2025:JHHC:14464
2
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) PS Case No. 50 of 2025.
6.
It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial Court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall cooperate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit