PAVAN YADAV @ PAVAN KUMAR AND 6 OTHERS v. DISTT. MAGISTRATE SULTANPUR AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/6730/2025 · 2025-07-22
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151489 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151489 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41787-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6730 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pavan Yadav @ Pavan Kumar And 6 Others Respondent :- Distt. Magistrate Sultanpur And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Shukla,Kaushlendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ram Raj Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard Shri Rajesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Ram Raj, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3. We have perused letter dated 08.12.2017 as also the
order dated 13.10.2017 passed in Writ Petition No. 25052 (M/B) of 2017. Let petitioners' application be considered and disposed of by the opposite parties no. 4 and 5 at the earliest, say, within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is submitted. If required the Zila Panchayat may also be heard. If any other department or corporation is required to be heard they may also be heard, as, it is said that the road which was earlier under the Zila Panchayat has now been transferred to the Public Works Department of the Government of U.P. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that we have not at all adjudicated upon the rights claimed by the petitioners in respect of the trees. . (Manish Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 22.7.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench