- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:318 WP No. 2732 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 2732 OF 2021 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: USHA.R W/O RAMESH.B.R., AGED 37 YEARS, 103, ELEGANT SILVER OAK APARTMENT, SPENCER ROAD, FRASER TOWN, BANGALORE - 560 005. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMEER.S.N., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATION INFORMATION OFFICER, BANASHANKARI POLICE STATION, BENGALURU-560 050. 2. THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BANASHANKARI POLICE STATION, BENGALURU-560 050. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:318 WP No. 2732 of 2021 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 06.01.2025, on that day, when the matter is called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, the office was directed to list this matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on 07.01.2025. The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. As could be seen from the petition papers, the petition is filed in the year 2021. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending for almost four years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19