Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 151478 (ALL)

RAGHAVRAM AND 4 OTHERS v. CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, BIKAPUR, AYODHYA AND ANOTHER

A227/4198/2025 · 2025-07-16

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40489 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4198 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raghavram And 4 Others Respondent :- Consolidation Officer, Bikapur, Ayodhya And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar,Rajeev Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondent is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No. 1 / Consolidation Officer, Bikapur, Ayodhya to decide the pending restoration / recall application dated 05.10.2020 filed by the father of petitioners for recall of the order dated 03.06.2015 passed by the Consolidation Officer Bikapur, Ayodhya in Case No. 65 U/S 9-A(2) of the U.p. C.H. Act (Santram Vs. Ram Dulare) expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent No. 1 / Consolidation Officer, Bikapur, Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No. 1 / Consolidation Officer, Bikapur, Ayodhya, is directed to decidepending restoration / recall application dated 05.10.2020 filed by the father of petitioners for recall of the order dated 03.06.2015 passed by the Consolidation Officer Bikapur, Ayodhya in Case No. 65 U/S 9-A(2) of the U.p. C.H. Act (Santram Vs. Ram Dulare), expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench