APHC010191772003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 6177/2003 Between: 1. CH. CHIRANJEEVI, S/O.LATE RAMASWAMY, R/O.PLOT, NO.17, D.NO.12-123A, GAJAPATHI NAGAR,NEAR NARASIMHA NAGAR, 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF A P SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPT HYD 4 ORS, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (SCHOOL EDUCATION),SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, GOVT.OF A.P., HYDERABAD. 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECT FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE C B M HIGH SCHOOL, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND CORRESPONDENT. VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the 5th respondent in IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 6177/2003 CH. CHIRANJEEVI, S/O.LATE RAMASWAMY, R/O.PLOT, NO.17, 123A, GAJAPATHI NAGAR,NEAR NARASIMHA NAGAR, ...PETITIONER AND THE GOVERNMENT OF A P SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPT HYD 4 ORS, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,EDUCATION DEPARTMENT EDUCATION),SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, GOVT.OF A.P., HYDERABAD. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECT FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. THE C B M HIGH SCHOOL, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND CORRESPONDENT. VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the 5th respondent in IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CH. CHIRANJEEVI, S/O.LATE RAMASWAMY, R/O.PLOT, NO.17, 123A, GAJAPATHI NAGAR,NEAR NARASIMHA NAGAR, ...PETITIONER THE GOVERNMENT OF A P SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPT HYD 4 ORS, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECT FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION, THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, THE C B M HIGH SCHOOL, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND CORRESPONDENT. VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the 5th respondent in 2 terminating the petitioner without any approval from the 3rd respondent as highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of A.P. Education Act and further action of the respondents 1 to 3 in not taking any action against the 5th respondent for acting contrary to the provisions of A.P. Education Act and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with all attendant benefits by setting aside the proceedings issued by the 5th respondent dated 14-2-96 by implementing the proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent in proceedings Rc.No.220/A2/94, dated 21-3-96 and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 8087 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into duty pending disposal of the writ petition and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. D V SITARAMAMURTHY 3 The Court made the following order: Sri K.Bharat Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri G.V.Shivaji, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 12.09.2025 MP 4 119 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 6177 OF 2003 Dated: 12.09.2025 MP