Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15146 (RAJ)

SARJU DEVI BAIRWA W/O SHRI JANSHI RAM BAIRWA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/7058/2023 · 2025-08-26

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7058/2023 Sarju Devi Bairwa W/o Shri Janshi Ram Bairwa, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of 7C, Vivekanand Colony, Naya Kheda, Ambabari, Jaipur - 302039. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The District Collector Jaipur, District Jaipur. 2. The Deputy District Collector And Magistrate, Bassi, District Jaipur. 3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Bassi, District Jaipur 4. The Tehsildar, Bassi, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 26/08/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore humbly prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and by an appropriate writ, order or direction:- (1) The respondents may be directed to execute the order dated 15.07.2019, which has not been executed for last more than three years and 09 months by the respondent No. 2. (2) Appropriate disciplinary action may be directed to be initiated against the officers who are posted as Tehsildar Bassi and Sub Divisional Officer Bassi during this period who are not able to get the order executed. (2 of 2) [CW-7058/2023] (3) Any other appropriate order, which may be found just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents for execution of the order dated 15.07.2019 and a further direction has been sought for measurement of the subject land using an ETS Machine. 3. The documents annexed with the reply as Annexure R3/1 indicates that the subject land has already been measured by the respondents using ETS Machine. The grievance raised by the petitioner has already been redressed. Hence, under the changed circumstances, no cause of action survives with the petitioner to continue with this writ petition and the present writ has become infructuous. 4. Dismissed as rendered infructuous. 5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/63