DINESH KUMAR DUBEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE SECY. DAIRY DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/7579/2025 · 2025-07-15
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151459 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151459 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40392 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7579 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Dubey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Secy. Dairy Development Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Himanshu Kamboj,Amit Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sandeep Sharma,Shanker Lal Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Daya Shanker Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2, Sri Utsav Mishra, Advocate who has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent no. 3 which is taken on record and Sri Shanker Lal, learned appearing for the respondent no. 4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner petitioner that despite the petitioner having retired on 31.08.2017 while working as a Store Assistant from the office of the respondent no. 4, his retiral dues have still not been paid to him.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which Sri Daya Shanker Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2, Sri Utsav Mishra,
learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 and Sri Shanker Lal,
learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 15.7.2025/Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench