Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15143 (AP)

MUDUNURI VENKATA RAMANA RAJU v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/12314/2022 · 2025-05-06

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

a .1 ■ 1^- [ 3505 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMAR (Special Original Jurisdiction) (,j *o m WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY m * vC5 TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 12314 OF 2022 Between: Sri Mudunuri Venkata Ramana Raju, S/o (L) Bairagi Raju, Aged 60 R/at 43-14-6, Subbalaxmi Nagar Railway New Colony, Visakhapatnam ...PETITIONER yrs AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal Secretary ( Stamps & Registation) Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The District Registrar, District Registrar Office Visakhapatnam. 3. The Sub Registrar, Akkayyapalem Visakhapatnam. 16. 4. Thotakura Venkata Lakshmi, W./o (L)ThotakuraVaraha Narasimha Raju Aged 58 yrs R/at SRK Towers, Flat No.504 behind HDFC bank, Saluru, Vizianagaram Dist., 5. Mudunuru Surya Kantham, W/o(L) M.Byragi Raju, Aged 85 yrs SRK Towers, Flat No.504 behind HDFC bank, Saluru, Vizianagaram Dist. Sub Registration Office Dwarakanagar, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents , particularly 3rd Respondent in entertained the registered gift deed bearing No.5624/2020 dt.27-11-2020 & 4311/2015 dt,27-11-2015 in the name of 4th Respondent executed by 5th Respondent even though the 5rh Respondent have no right nor title in view of Will in the name of 5th Respondent already Cancelled Will dt.15- 04-1994, even then, entertained the documents by the 3rd Respondent, in that connection the Petitioner who is the owner of the property issued a representation dated 29-07-2021 to the 3rd Respondent , inspite of the same , kept quite without passing any order , all are Illegal, Unlawful, Violation of Principles of Natural Justice, Violation of Article 14,19,300-A- of the Constitution of India , Consequently to direct the 3rd Respondent to dispose of the petitioner representation dt.29-07-2021 by cancel the gift deeds bearing Document No.5624/2020 dt.27-11-2020 and 4311/2015 dt 27-11-2015 executed by 5th Respondent in the name of 4th Respondent in the interest of the justice. iA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an Order to direct the 3rd Respondent i.e.. Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam to dispose of the petitioner Representation dt.29-07-2021 pending disposal of the main Writ Petition in the interesl of the justice. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI V V RAVI PRASAD The Court made the following: APHC010191702022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3505] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 12314/2022 Between: Mudunuri Venkata Ramana Raju ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.VVN NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.VVRAVI PRASAD 2.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) The Court made the following order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, subsequent to the filing of the present writ petition, the petitioner has filed suit vide O.S.No.41 of 2024, on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, seeking cancellation of the gift deeds, which are in dispute in the present writ petition. 2. The submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed, giving liberty to the petitioner to agitate his rights in the suit filed by him in accordance with law. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P.VINOD KUIMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to SRI. VV N NARXyANA RAO Advocate 2. One CC to SRI V V RAVI PRASAD Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies [OPUC] (AP) ,High Court HIGH COURT DATED:07/05/2025 ORDER 8» 5 tJSE^WS WP.No.12314of 2022 ^ . Current Section THE WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED