MOHD. FAHEEM @ FAHIM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
NA528/758/2025 · 2025-07-15
Subhash Vidyarthi
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151392 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151392 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40281 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 758 of 2025 Applicant :- Mohd. Faheem @ Fahim Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Piyush Pathak,Vipul Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Virendra Singh Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Sri Piyush Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Sagar Singh, learned counsel for the State and perused the file, including the Annexures attached therewith. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C./Section 528 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in four cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that it is impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each case, details of which are as follows:
"i. Case Crime No.177 of 2024, under Section 309 (4), 317(2) B.N.S. Police Station Kaiserbagh, District Lucknow, ii. Case Crime No.28 of 2025, under Section 304 (2), 317(2) B.N.S. Police Station Kaiserbagh, District Lucknow, and
iii. Case Crime No.50 of 2025, under Section 304 (2) B.N.S. Police Station Talkatora, District Lucknow."
4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case which shall be treated to be valid in other two cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. . [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Ram.
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench