Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15137 (RAJ)

SAAVARIYA S/O KANHAIYA LAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4977/2025 · 2025-06-12

Anand Sharma V J

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23123] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3760/2025 Hariom S/o Bhawarlal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Adila, Police Station-Kapren, District-Bundi (Raj.) (Presently Accused Confined In District Jail Bundi). ----accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4977/2025 Saavariya S/o Kanhaiya Lal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Rangrajpura Police Station K. Patan, District Bundi Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bundi) ----accused-Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar Mr. Saddik Ahmed Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, Dy. G.A. with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA (V. J.) Order 12/06/2025 1. These bail applications under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 have been filed by the accused- petitioners in respect of F.I.R. No.16/2025 registered at Police Station Kapren District Bundi for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 333, 324(6), 118(1), 109(1) & 189(3) of B.N.S., 2023. [2025:RJ-JP:23123] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3760/2025] 2. Learned counsels for the accused-petitioners submit that the injury sustained to injured Chotulal Meena has been assigned by Bharat Meena and no specific injury has been assigned to the petitioners which can be said to be grievous, much less than dangerous to life. They further submit that the accused- petitioners have falsely been implicated in the case, whereas, they have not committed the offences alleged against them. He also submits that there are no criminal antecedents against them. Trial is likely to take considerably long time, therefore, the accused- petitioners may be allowed to enlarge on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications. 4. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 5. In view of above, without making any comment over the merits of the case, I am inclined to grant these bail applications. 6. Accordingly, these Bail Applications are hereby allowed. the accused-petitioners Hariom S/o Bhawarlal & Saavariya S/o Kanhaiya Lal shall be released on bail in pursuance of F.I.R. No.16/2025 registered at Police Station Kapren District Bundi on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each along with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the accused-petitioners shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) They shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) They shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. [2025:RJ-JP:23123] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3760/2025] (iii) They shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless their presence is exempted by the trial Court. 7. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise. 8. Office is directed to place a copy of this order in connected case file. (ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)),J DAKSH/30-31