SMT. SAYMA BANO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A483/507/2024 · 2025-09-10
Shree Prakash Singh
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151361 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151361 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 507 of 2024 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the applicant to press this application.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The application under Section 483 Cr.P.C./529 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records.
7. Office is directed to communicate this order to the trial court concerned forthwith. September 10, 2025 kanhaiya Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manjusha Kapil Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mahendra Pratap Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt. Sayma Bano .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench