Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15136 (CHH)

LAKHESWARI DEVI VERMA v. SIDDHARTH KOMAL PARDESHI

CONT/482/2025 · 2025-04-11

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:16985 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 482 of 2025 1 - Lakheswari Devi Verma W/o Durga Prasad Verma Aged About 49 Years Working As Head Master Government Primary School, Matguda, Block- Bagbahra, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 2 - Beniram Chakradhari S/o Anhai Chakradhari Aged About 52 Years Working As Headmaster Government Primary School, Mongarapali- S, Block- Bagbahara, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 3 - Khemraj Tandan S/o Ramcharan Tandan Aged About 54 Years Working As Headmaster Government Primary School, Saraipali- (Su), Block- Bagbahara, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 4 - Amir Singh Diwan S/o Rain Singh Diwan Aged About 54 Years Working As Headmaster Government Primary School, Tupakbora, Block- Bagbahara, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 5 - Benuram Choure S/o Punuram Choure Aged About 59 Years Working As Headmaster Government Primary School, Paterapali (S), Block- Bagbahara, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) Chhattisgarh 6 - Kiran Nag S/o Rajesh Kumar Nag Aged About 49 Years Working As Headmaster Government Primary School, Harnadadar, Block- Bagbahara, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) Chhattisgarh AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.04.16 17:47:48 +0530 2 7 - Afsa Khan D/o Azim Aged About 56 Years Working As Headmaster Government Primary School, Junwani Khurd, Block- Bagbahara, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Siddharth Komal Pardeshi The Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Revenue And Civil District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Niharika Barik Singh The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Developement, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Revenue And Civil District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Priyanka Rishi Mahobia The Commissioner Cum Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Shri Vinay Kumar Lahenga The Collector, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 5 - Shri Mohan Rao Sawant The District Education Officer, Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 6 - Shri R. K. Verma The Block Education Officer, Bagbahara, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 7 - Shri S. Alok The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 8 - Shri M. L. Mandvi The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bagbahara, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) :Mr. R.K. Verma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 3 11/04/2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that vide order dated 04/10/2024 passed in WPS No.6239/2024, this Court has expected that the respondent Nos.2 & 3/competent authority shall consider the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law by considering the circular issued in this regard, in the light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261/2023 within a further period of four months from the date of receipt of representation filed by the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioners moved their representations with regard to the order passed by this Court, however, no decision has been taken till date. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the documents. 3. From perusal of the order dated 04/10/2024, it was expected by the Court that the respondent Nos.2 & 3 shall take a decision on the representation submitted by the petitioners and it appears that in spite of representation submitted by the petitioners, the respondent Nos.2& 3 have not decided the said representations. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are at liberty to apprise the respondents Nos.2 & 3 again about the order of this Court and it is directed that respondent shall consider the same and necessary order be passed in accordance with law. 4 5. With the aforesaid observation, the present contempt petition is disposed of. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep