VIBHAV v. NAYAB TEHSILDAR NAGAR, TEHSIL SADAR, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/4279/2025 · 2025-07-21
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151348 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151348 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43137
Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4279 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vibhav Respondent :- Nayab Tehsildar Nagar, Tehsil Sadar, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no.1.
2. In view of order being proposed to be passed, notices to opposite parties no.2 and 3 stand dispensed with.
3. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for deciding mutation case filed by petitioner under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006 which is pending since 24.04.2024 after being recalled.
4. Since mutation proceedings by the very nature are summary, opposite party no.1 i.e. Nayab Tehsildar Nagar Tehsil, Sadar, Ayodhya is directed to decide Mutation Case No.6947 of 2024 i.e. Computerized
Case
No.T-202404230106947 (Krishna Chandra versus Girja Shankar) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006 expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is brought on record on the proceedings after affording opportunity of hearing to opposite parties no.2 & 3 (Girja Shankar Pandey and Krishan Chandra). In case there is no legal impediment. In case of non-cooperation, benefit of this order shall not be available to petitioner.
5. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 21.7.2025 Subodh/- Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench