SHIVRAJ SINGH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES LKO./CHAIRMAN U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/7575/2025 · 2025-07-17
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151342 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151342 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40749 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7575 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shivraj Singh Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Food And Civil Supplies Lko./Chairman U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satendra Nath Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mahendra Pratap Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1.Vakalatnama filed by Sri Prafulla Tiwari, learned counsel, on behalf of respondents no.2 and 3, is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1, and Sri Tarun Mishra holding brief of Sri Prafulla Tiwari, learned counsel for respondents no.2 and 3.
3. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally.
4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.07.2022 neither his post retiral dues pertaining to gratuity, leave encashment nor the arrears of salary pertaining to 82 months along with interest have been paid till date and hence the petition.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.2 which may be
directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels appearing for respondents have no objection.
6. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.2 then respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.
7. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off.
8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 17.7.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench