Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 151325 (ALL)

M/S VIRAJ PRAKASHAN PVT. LTD., THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR/ AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, DR. SUDHARMA SINGH v. SMT. BEENA SHARMA

SCCRD/10/2023 · 2025-07-08

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38764 Court No. - 7 Case :- S.C.C. REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 10 of 2023 Revisionist :- M/S Viraj Prakashan Pvt. Ltd., Through Its Director/ Authorised Signatory, Dr. Sudharma Singh Opposite Party :- Smt. Beena Sharma Counsel for Revisionist :- Alok Saran,Sachin Garg Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ram Ji Das,Vishnu Pad Das Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Order on I.A. No.1 of 2023 1. The application seeks for condonation of delay in filing the revision. 2. The cause shown is sufficient. The application is allowed. 3. Delay in filing the revision is condoned. Order on Revision 4. Heard Sri Alok Saran, learned Counsel for the revisionist. 5.The present revision has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 03.04.2023 whereby the suit in question was decreed. 6. The order impugned impugned reveals that after the exchange of pleadings, five points for determination were framed. While determining the first question, it was upheld that the U.P. Act No.13 of 1972 is not applicable and finding of facts have been recorded in support thereof. The findings of facts with regard to the arrears of rent and service of notice have also been record. 7. Considering the finding of facts recorded in the order impugned, no interference is called for. 8. The revision lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench