PHOOL SINGH SANSI S/O SH. DEEPAK SINGH @ DIPAKYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5066/2025 · 2025-05-23
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15131 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15131 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:21857] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5066/2025 Phool Singh Sansi S/o Sh. Deepak Singh @ Dipakya, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Gol Dungari, Ward No. 45, Keeron Ki Basti, P.s. Sadar, District Tonk. At Present House No. 26 Amaa Hingalraj Nagar Extension, Gandhi Path West, P.s. Karni Vihar, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Majhar Hussain with Ms. Rekha Kanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 23/05/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0184/2025 registered at Police Station-Karnivihar, District-Jaipur (West) for the offence under Section 8/21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Recovered contraband from the conscious possession of the petitioner is below the commercial quantity. He further submits that though there was a previous case registered against the petitioner but, that too,
[2025:RJ-JP:21857] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5066/2025] belongs to below commercial quantity. He again submits that similarly situated co-accused- Smt. Anju Shansi has already been enlarged on bail by this Court on 01.05.2025. The petitioner is behind the Bar since long. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, especially the fact that recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity and on the ground of parity but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Phool Singh Sansi S/o Sh. Deepak Singh @ Dipakya shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/167