Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40178 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5684 of 2025 Applicant :- Ram Bahadur Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Praveen Kumar Yadav,Manav Gupta,Saquib Zia Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Praveen Kumar Yadav, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Manish Vikram Singh Chauhan, the learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the file, including the Annexures attached therewith. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in all five cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that it is impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases, details of which are as follows: "i. Case Crime No.797/2022, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C. Police Station- Gomti Nagar, District- Lucknow, ii. Case Crime No.15/2025, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 120-B I.P.C. Police Station- Gomti Nagar, District- Lucknow, iii. Case Crime No.798/2022, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C. Police Station- Gomti Nagar, District- Lucknow, iv. Case Crime No.818/2022, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C. Police Station- Gomti Nagar, District- Lucknow, and v. Case Crime No.424/2022, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C. Police Station- Gomti Nagar, District- Lucknow. 4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each in one case which shall be treated to be valid in all five cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Preeti. Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench