- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:944 WP No. 2355 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 2355 OF 2020 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SMT. LEENA UDAYASHANKAR W/O T.R. UDAYASHANKAR, OCC. ADVOCATE, R/AT NO. 2252, 22ND CROSS, K.R. ROAD, BANASHANKARI 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU – 560 040. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. LEENA UDAY SHNKAR, PARTY-IN-PERSON) AND: 1. THE BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N.R. SQUARE, BEBNGALURU – 560 002 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BBMP, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, WARD NO. 166, BANASHANKARI SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU – 560 070. 3. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (SOUTH) BBMP, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALKE, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU – 560 011. 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING (SOUTH) BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:944 WP No. 2355 of 2020 PALIKE, MAHANAGARA PALIKE COMMERCIAL COMPLEX 2ND BLOCK, 9TH CROSS 9TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU – 560 011. 5. B.S. MOHAN S/O SHIVAIAH R/AT NO.2253, 22ND CROSS KR ROAD, BANASHANKARI 2ND STAGE BENGALURU – 560 070. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI T.M. VENKATA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 TO R-4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT THE R- TO 3 TO DEMOLISH THE ILLEGAL AND UNAUTHORISED CONSTRUCTION BEING PUT UP OVER SCHEDULE PROPERTY BY THE R-5 IN VIOLATION OF SANCTIONED PLAN, PROVISIONS OF BBMP ACT AND RULES AND BUILDING BY LAWS . THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. It is noticed that Court notice was issued to the party-in-person and the said notice has been returned with an endorsement ‘no such person at this address’. There is also an endorsement that the ‘address cannot be located enquiry’. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:944 WP No. 2355 of 2020 2. Since, the Registry would have no manner of locating the petitioner, except by addressing the notice to the address furnished by him, it is obvious that no steps can be taken and the petitioner does not appear to have any interest in prosecuting this writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21