IN TH 106 Dr. Deepak Sh. Sudhi Health, Sta CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU proceeding order dated of this Cou Haryana an respondent dated 03.6 order after parties wit of this ord representat COCP-5784-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.5784 o Date of decision eepak Versus Sudhir Rajpal, Additional Chief S th, State of Haryana, Chandigarh AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Meenal Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petiti eedings be initiated against the respon r dated 19.5.2025 (Annexure P-1) pass is Court in CWP-14482-2025 titled a ana and others”, whereby the petition ndent No.3 therein “….to consider an 03.6.2024 (Annexure P-8) by passin after affording an opportunity of within a period of three months of order. Needless to mention that entation, if any amount is found 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 5784 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-09.02.2026 …..Petitioner hief Secretary, Department of …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA cate dl. A.G., Haryana. petitioner submits that contempt respondent for not complying the ) passed by a co-ordinate Bench itled as “Dr. Deepak vs. State of etition was disposed of directing r and decide the representation ssing a reasoned and speaking of hearing to the respective s of the receipt of certified copy hat upon considering the said und due and payable to the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.11 20.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document petitioner, within a fu submits tha been comp authority; t may be disp the petition liberty is g passed by t February 0 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-5784-2025 (O & M) ner, the same shall be disbursed i a further period of one month.” At the very outset, learned its that the Writ Court order dated 19. complied with by passing a speaking rity; thus, no cause survives in the pr be disposed of as such. In view of the submissions m etitioner, the present contempt petitio ty is granted to the petitioner to cha ed by the respondents-authority, as per Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, uary 09, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 ed in favour of the petitioner arned counsel for the petitioner ted 19.5.2025 (Annexure P-1) has eaking order by the respondents- the present petition and the same ons made by learned counsel for petition is disposed of. However, to challenge the speaking order as per law. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.11 20.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document