RUNWAY MOTORS v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER STATE TAXES AND EXCISE AND ANOTHER
CWP/4830/2025 · 2026-04-09
Ranjan Sharma, Vivek Singh Thakur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1513 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1513 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 4830 of 2025 Date of Decision: 09.04.2026 Runway Motors ....Petitioner Versus Assistant Commissioner, State Taxes & Excise & Anr.
....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate, with Goverdhan Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Sushant Keprate, Additional Advocate General. Vivek Singh Thakur,Judge (oral)
By way of this petition, the impugned order dated 19.09.2024 (Annexure P-6), passed by the Appellate Authority under Section 107(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, has been assailed.
2. As per the statutory remedy available under Section 112 of the CGST Act, the petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy of filing an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, which is now functional.
3. Therefore, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate appeal as available under Section 112 of the CGST Act, read with the Gazette Notification No. S.O. 4220(E), dated ____________
17.09.2025, published by the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) and Gazette Notification No. EXN-F(10)-2/2025-Vol-I, dated 24.02.2026, published by State Taxes and Excise Department.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Vivek Singh Thakur) (Judge) (Ranjan Sharma) (Judge) 09th April, 2026 (Shamsh Tabrez) ____________