DEVID v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. URBAN DEVELOPMENNNT LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/7626/2025 · 2025-07-15
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151285 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151285 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40371 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7626 of 2025 Petitioner :- Devid Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Urban Developmennnt Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Subodh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ravi Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1, and Ms. Shambhavi Singh holding brief of Sri Ravi Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondents no.2 to 5.
2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally.
3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondents have failed to extend the benefit of Assured Career Progression (ACP) since July 2021 although the persons similarly circumstanced have been granted the said benefit on completion of ten years of service with all consequential benefits. It is also contended that the respondents have failed to provide pay fixation and increments of the suspension period, bonus amount of 2021 to 2023, provident fund amount of Rs.2.25 lakhs and arrears of dearness allowance since January 2021 to November 2021 including the amount of medical leave for 24 days with all consequential benefits.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.3 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents has no objection.
5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench