Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 151280 (ALL)

YUSUF v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

A482/5781/2025 · 2025-07-18

Subhash Vidyarthi

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41424 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5781 of 2025 Applicant :- Yusuf Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Umesh Kumar Maurya,Vikas Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Vikas Maurya, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Angad Kumar Vishwakarma, learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the file, including the Annexures attached therewith. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in two cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that it is impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases, details of which are as follows: "i. Case Crime No.344 of 2018, under Section 304 I.P.C. Police Station Hussaiganj, Dsitrict Lucknow; and ii. Case Crime No.154 of 2023, under Sections 307, 504 I.P.C. and Section 4/25 Arms Act, Police Station Hussainganj, District Lucknow." 4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case which shall be treated to be valid in other case cases wherein the bail order has been passed. . [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] Order Date :- 18.7.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench