Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40274 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 751 of 2025 Applicant :- Enul And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Ahmad Mehdi,Saniya Ansari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Syed Ahmad, the learned counsel for the applicants as well as Sri Hansraj Verma, the learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C./Section 528 BNSS has been filed seeking quashing of the charge sheet no.A- 321(01) of 2024, cognizance order dated 10.04.2025 along with entire proceedings of Sessions Trial No.94 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No.282 of 2024, under Sections 131, 352, 351(3) B.N.S. and Section 11(Gha) Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 Police Station Akhand Nagar, District Sultanpur, pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Kadipur, District Sultanpur. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in the present case. 3. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the aforesaid prayer and has submitted that while exercising the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C., this Court cannot go into the correctness of the allegations made against the applicanst and has only to examine whether on the basis of the allegations made and material collected during investigation, the offences are made out against the applicants or not. 4. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in C.B.I. v. Aryan Singh, 2023 SCC Online SC 379 has held that while exercising the powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the Court is not required to conduct a mini trial. It does not require the prosecution/investigating agency to prove the allegations. While exercising the powers under Section 482 of the CrPC the Court has very limited jurisdiction and is required to consider "whether any sufficient material is available to proceed further against the accused for which the accused is required to be tried or not". 5. Confronted with the aforesaid objection, the learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to surrender and move an application, before the court concerned seeking bail and suitable directions may be issued that same may be heard and decided expeditiously, in accordance to law. 6. Accordingly, the instant application is disposed of by observing that in case the applicants appear and file an application for their release on bail, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law, including the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil v. C.B.I., (2022) 10 SCC 51. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench