HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8417 of 2018 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the material available on record. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the award dated 30.08.2017, whereby, the order was passed for reinstatement along with 50 % back wages. 3. The case of the respondent- workman was that he has ousted from service on 18.06.1994, without there being any formal order which was the violation of Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act. 4. The Labour Court after analyzing the evidence, ultimately held that generally, no appointment letters, etc. were issued, no evidence was led by the workman also in the form of the co-workers whose name was taken but they were not brought into evidence. The Court recorded that, the labour dispute was raised after five years allegedly being removal from service. On the basis of the evidence, it was found that, the workman had completed 240 days, thus, the benefit of Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act had to be accorded to the workman. 5. The award in question was delivered on 30.08.2017 and, admittedly, the petitioner was removed from service on 17.06.1994. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : C.S.C. Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., C.K. Sahu, K.K. Tripathi, S.K. Tripathi Director Rajya Krishi Prabandh Sansthan Rahman Khera Lucknow .....Petitioner(s) Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Ii U.P. Lucknowand Anr .....Respondent(s) 6. Considering the long delay and, there being no evidence from either of the side and also considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing that the award shall stand satisfied if, the petitioner pay an amount of Rs. 2,50,000/- within a period of three months. September 18, 2025 Praveen WRIC No. 8417 of 2018 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench