Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 151250 (ALL)

SUKH LAL AND 4 OTHERS v. BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P., LUCKNOW THRU. SECRETARY AND 2 OTHERS

A227/4169/2025 · 2025-07-15

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40284 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4169 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sukh Lal And 4 Others Respondent :- Board Of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow Thru. Secretary And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that there is typographical error in the array of the parties and he may be permitted to correct the designation of opposite party No.1. 2. The oral prayer is allowed. He is permitted to incorporate necessary amendment during course of the day. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent No.s 1 and 2 while notice on behalf of respondent No.3- Gram Sabha has been accepted by Sri Pankaj Gupta. 4. Instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 -Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to decide Revision No.281/2004-2005, computerized no.R200506230022408 (State of U.P. Vs. Maikoo Lal and others) pending since 25.7.2005 filed by opposite party No.2, expeditiously. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide Revision No.281/2004- 2005, computerized no.R200506230022408 (State of U.P. Vs. Maikoo Lal and others) pending since 25.7.2005 filed by opposite party No.2 expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 15.7.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench