VIJAY PRATAP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/4177/2025 · 2025-07-16
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151242 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151242 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40485 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4177 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vijay Pratap Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aakanksha Shah Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Ms. Aakanksha Shah, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel on behalf of State- respondents.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of Appeal / Case No. 2268 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. C202404000005568) U/S 207 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 Village - Khunsheshpur, Pargana Chanda, Tehsil Lambhua, District - Sultanpur arising title of Vijay Pratap Vs. Hariram and others.
4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the appeal is not being decided.
5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that trial Court/competent authority may be
directed to decide the aforesaid appeal in a time bound manner.
6. At this stage, no ground for urgency is made out by the petitioner, hence, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the trial Court/competent authority and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of aforesaid appeal, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the trial Court/competent authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, in accordance with law.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court/competent authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
8. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench