Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15123 (AP)

Chandubhaigari Saleem v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/8216/2019 · 2025-09-03

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010190192019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) V. THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8216 OF 2019 Between: Chandubhaigari Saleem, S/o Chandubhaigari Shaleem, Age 31 years, Occ Private employee. District, A.P R/o Kogata Village, Kamalapuram Mandal, Kadapa ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velgapudi, Guntur District, A.P. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa District, A.P 3. The Circle Inspector, Yerraguntle^ Kadapa District, A.P. 4. The Station House Officer, Kamalapuram P.S, Kadapa District, A.P. 5. Shaik Naseemun, W/o Saleem, Aged about 26 years. House wife, R/o Opposite Jenta chetuu Main Road, Chillamkur Village, Yerraguntia Mandal, Kadapa District. 6. Shaik Mahaboob Shareef, S/o Not known to this petitioner. Aged about 60 years, Occ Rtd ICL employee, R/o Opposite Jenta chetuu Main Road, Chillamkur Village, Yerraguntia Mandal, Kadapa District 7. S Nuru Bhasha, S/o Mahaboob Shareef, Aged about 30 years, R/o Opposite Jenta chetuu Main Road, Chillamkur Village, Yerraguntia Mandal, Kadapa District- j 8. Shaik Gouse Bee, W/o Mahaboob basha , Aged about 38 wife, R/o Vuppaluru Village, Muddanuru Mandal, Kadapa District. 9. S Mahaboob Basha, S/o Not known to this petitioner. Age 45 R/o Vuppaluru Village, Muddanuru Mandal, Kadapa District. 10. Mabu, SI o Not known to this petitioner. Age 45 years, Occ Ex sarpach, R/ o Konapuram Village, Muddanur Mandal, Kadapa District. years. House years ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents herein in not taking any action on the complaint given by the petitioner herein personally on 15- 4-2019 and on 18-4-2019 and again through registered post on 11-6-2019 sent through registered post against the respondents 5 to 10 herein as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and consequentially direct, the official Respondents herein to take appropriate action against the respondents 5 to 10 herein forthwith and grant such other relief and reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the official respondents herein to take appropriate action on the complaint given by the petitioner herein personally on 15-4-2019 and on 18-4-2019 and again on 11-6-2019 sent through registered post against the respondents 5 to 10 forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. NITESH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 10:— The Court made the following order: -■'V r IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETIPHNi NO: 8216/2019 ST" KAMAIAPUREM MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT, A.P APHC010190192019 [3368] V- 0?: THE ...PETITIONER AND 1 THF STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT buildings,VELGAPUDI,GUNTUR DISTRICT,A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, 3. ?h¥'c?r6Ce'' INSPECTOR, YERRAGUNTLE, KADAPA DISTRICT, A.P. 4 THE STATION M^N ROAD CH^LLAMKUR VILLAGE, YERRAGUNTLA 6 Sa^BO^aTeF, , S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC RTD ’ chSSs CS rSd! CHIlIamkUR VILIROE, YERR«GU»TIR • i^a«Hrw^??,°srv3fRR;ss KADAPA house OFFICER, ,KAMALAPURAM P.S, 2 VILLAGE, MUDDANURU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 9 S MAHa’bOOB BASRA, S/0 NOT KNOWN TO THIS AGE 45 YEARS, R/0 VUPPALURU PETITIONER, VILLAGE, MUDDANURU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 10.MABU, SL O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, AGE 45 YEARS, OCC EX SARPACH, R/ O KONAPURAM VILLAGE MUDDANUR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents herein in not taking any action on the complaint given by the petitioner herein personally on 15- 4-2019 and on 18-4-2019 and again through registered post on 11-6-2019 sent through registered post against the respondents 5 to 10 herein as illegal, arbitrary consequentially direct the official and unconstitutional Respondents herein to take appropriate action against the respondents 5 o 10 herein forthwith and grant lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the official respondents herein to take appropriate action on the complaint given by the petitioner herein personally on 15-4-2019 and on 18- 4-2019 and again on 11-6-2019 sent through registered post against the respondents 5 to 10 forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VNITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GPFOR HOME (AP) praying that in the THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8216 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri V.Nithesh, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- N. NAGAMMA assistant registrar //true copy// SECTION OFFICER To, 3. Two CD Copies. 1 ssb HIGH COURT DATED:04/09/2025 ORDER WP No.8216 OF 2019 |r I 1 SEP 2025 '^*sCiirrentS«Bo|i^^^ DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS