Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15122 (CHH)

RAMADHAR PATEL v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1584/2025 · 2025-03-26

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:14473 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1584 of 2025 1 - Ramadhar Patel S/o Shri Kirit Ram Patel Aged About 83 Years R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), Presently Resided At- Shanti Vihar, Near Bajrangbali Mandir, Mudapara, Korba, District Korba (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.). 2 - The Commissioner Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 3 - The Collector District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). 4 - Jeevan Lal S/o Shri Etan Prasad R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). 5 - Imtiyaz Meman S/o Shri Abdul Umar Meman R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). 6 - Chandrakant Tiwari Patwari Birra, R/o Village Birra, Tahsil Champa, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). 7 - Smt. Priyadarshaniya Dibya W/o Shri Ramanand Dibya R/o Ghinvra, Tahsil Jaijaipur, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate. Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 26/03/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court, may kindly call for the entire record in relates to the case of the Petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court, may kindly be pleased to issue the writ/ or writs, order / or orders, to direct the Respondent No.02 to decide the Appeal case No. 199/A-5/2016-17 "Title as Ramadhar Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh and others, filed by the petitioner on 27.01.2017, within stipulated period, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief, this Hon'ble Court, deem fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the Petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an appeal before respondent No. 2- the Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, District- Bilaspur challenging the order of the Collector dated 25.11.2015 way back on 27.01.2017, however, till dated it has not been decided and matter is still pending for 3 consideration. The last order sheet dated 07.02.2025 goes to show that on 07.02.2025 the matter was listed, however, since the record of the Court below could not be received, therefore, the matter was listed for further orders on 22.05.2025. 3. On the other hand learned counsel for the State opposes the same. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Looking to the period of the institution of the appeal the Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, District- Bilaspur is directed to dispose the case on 22.05.2025 itself. It is made clear that if any exigency arises due to which this case could not be decided on 22.05.2025 then the appeal shall be decided within a further period of 15 days and the compliance of the said decision be sent to the Registry of this Court for kind perusal. 6. With this observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat