SHANKAR LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. OF REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 10 OTHERS
WRIC/6625/2025 · 2025-07-18
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151213 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151213 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41191-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6625 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shankar Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Of Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Heard.
2. Learned Standing Counsel says that the order of demarcation under Section 24 was implemented and Pathar Nasab exercise was also carried out but thereafter private opposite parties have destroyed the boundary marks, as alleged.
3. Even if it so, the S.D.M. is obliged to take remedial action on an application to be submitted by the petitioner. Let the petitioner move an application before S.D.M. under the relevant provisions which shall be considered and necessary action be taken as per law but with promptness after getting the facts verified and hearing the private opposite parties.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 18.7.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench