MOHAMMAD ABDULLAH WANI AND ANR. v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE)
WP(C)/2495/2025 · 2026-09-14
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1512 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1512 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.30 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2495/2025 CM(6625/2025) MOHAMMAD ABDULLAH WANI AND ANR …PETITIONER(S) Through: Ms. Syed Ainain Qadri, Advocate. V/s.
UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) Through: Mr. Ilyas Nazir Laway, GA
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 14.09.2026
01. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length.
02. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, when confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition, fairly submits the instant petition be disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as may be available under law
03. According to Mr. Ilyas Nazir Laway, learned Government Advocate, the petitioner has to approach the appropriate authority which has been constituted by the Government in terms of Section 51 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, by virtue of S.O. 357 of 2024.
04. In the light of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and also in the light of the stand taken by the learned counsel for the respondents, no fruitful purpose would be served to keep this petition alive. Accordingly, the same is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy as may be available under law.
05. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of in the manner as indicated above along with connected application(s)
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 14.09.2026
“Hamid” Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document