MOHAMMAD MEHFIZ MIR v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION KUPWARA (HOME)
Bail App/42/2025 · 2025-11-28
Vinod Chatterji Koul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15117 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15117 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 13 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
Bail App 42/2025 MOHAMMAD MEHFIZ MIR
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Parveen Ahmad Wani, Advocate Vs.
STATION HOUSE OFFICER POLICE STATION KUPWARA
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Faheem Shah, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL-JUDGE
ORDER 28.11.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this application evidence of 10 witnesses stand recorded before the Trial court. He submits that he may be given liberty to approach before the Trial court afresh in view of the changed circumstances because the evidence of most of the important witnesses have been recorded. In view of the submissions made by the applicant’s counsel, he is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the Trial court with fresh bail application and order passed in this application would not come in the way of the Trial court in considering the bail application afresh. Dismissed as withdrawn.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE Srinagar
28.11.2025.
“Imtiyaz”
Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 04.12.2025 10:23