Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1511 (UTT)

RASHMI SHARMA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/16/2023 · 2025-05-15

Alok Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3954 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 15.05. 2025. ABA No.16 of 2023 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. There is no representation on behalf of the applicants. 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Nikhil Singhal, learned counsel for the informant. 4. On 05.05.2025, Mr. Divyaman Singh Sen, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocate, for the applicants sought further one week’s time as a last opportunity to file response to the counter affidavit. 5. Response has not been filed. 6. The present Anticipatory Bail Application (ABA No.16 of 2023) is dismissed for want of prosecution. …………………. (Alok Kumar Verma, J.) 15.05.2025 Pant/