[2025:RJ-JP:16356-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 338/2025 Dr. Nand Lal Jat Son Of Shri Sunda Ram Jat, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of Village Isharawala, Post Bilonchi, Via Morija - District Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Akhil Arora,additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Finance (Rules Division), Governmentof Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Thropugh Its Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Finance ( Rules Division), Govnerment Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. Rajasthan. 3. Dr. Krishna Kant Pathak, Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Governement Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Bhawani Singh Detha, Principal Secretary, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Dr. Anand Kumar Sharma,director, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitesh Kumar Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, AAG with Mr. Samee Khan HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 17/04/2025 1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 13.07.2022 passed in a batch of petitions including petition filed by the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:16356-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-338/2025] 2. We find that in large number of cases, similar orders are being passed which required the respondents to take appropriate steps for grant of consequential benefits including pension with fixation. 3. It appears that because of the pendency of cases before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and certain orders passed, the compliance of the order was deferred. 4. At this stage, now the compliance is being made in view of dismissal of SLP in case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Etc. Vs. Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma and Ors. Etc. 5. Let necessary orders be now passed towards compliance of the direction within a period of six weeks. In case, such orders are not passed, it will be open for the petitioner to approach the Court by filing the contempt petition. 6. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ N.Gandhi/Neeru/16